23 Days Silent at $214,900. Then $225 of Photos and 3 Offers.
My 1964 Wichita ranch listed June 12 at $214,900 with phone photos. It sat 23 days with four showings and one $189,000 offer. A photographer charged $225 on July 5. The refreshed listing drew 11 showings in nine days. Three offers arrived by July 19. I accepted $212,500.
Twenty-three days of silence, counted from Thursday, June 12, when my 1964 ranch in Wichita went live at $214,900. I got the number from my agent on the phone at 4:50 in the afternoon on July 5, standing in my own hallway while a photographer lay flat on his stomach in front of me with a wide lens and a bubble level, photographing the same 11 feet of plaster I had stared at for a month. The house had four showings to its name. One offer, $189,000, with a pre-approval letter attached.
Two mortgages explain the mood. We closed on the new place in Andover on May 29, so from June 12 I carried $1,318 and $1,046, a combined $2,364 a month, on a teacher salary and my husband's two part-time jobs. My agent, Jolene, wanted a price cut to $209,900. I kept asking why the house looked so slight on my phone when it does not feel modest standing in it.
The photos were the problem. My agent had shot 'em herself on her phone in one rushed hour before a rainstorm on June 10, and every room sat dim, tilted, and cramped, with the hallway shot bending the doorframes and eating the light. Four showings. One insult of an offer. That was the evidence, and I had certified it myself.
twenty-three days of silence
The listing analytics made the silence measurable, which is somehow worse than a quiet phone. 328 views, 14 saves, four showings booked in the first week, then nothin' booked after June 22. The one offer came June 30 at $189,000, twenty-five thousand nine hundred under ask, and the buyer's agent described it on the phone as a starting conversation. It was not one.
four showings and one insult
Feedback cards trickled in from the four showings, and three of 'em said the same thing: the rooms read modest online than in person. One buyer's agent wrote that the listing photographs do not match the floor plan. I read those cards four times before it clicked. Buyers were judging the house on evidence I had produced, on a phone, at 7 at night, before rain.
photos shot before a rainstorm
The story of the originals is exactly what it sounds like. Jolene shot 19 photos in about an hour on June 10, between a showing and a storm, and 14 of 'em used the room's own lamp as the light source. Wide-angle distortion bowed the doorframes. The kitchen shot faced the window, so the counters sat in shadow while the yard glowed. She is a fine agent. She is not a photographer, and neither was I, which was the actual problem.
$225 on a Saturday
Martin charges $225 for 28 photos, twilight exterior included, and I found him thru the local Realtor board directory after two other photographers came back at $300 and $375. He arrived July 5 at 4 in the afternoon, spent 90 minutes, opened every blind, moved two lamps, knelt in my hallway for the shot that broke the listing loose, and stayed past sunset. He also refused to photograph the washer and dryer corner, on the grounds that it was not helping anybody.
the twilight shot, blue hour
The exterior he kept for last, porch light on, sky going cobalt, and he took 11 frames of it to get one. That photo now leads the listing's gallery preview on three different sites, cuz at thumbnail size it reads like a magazine and not like a foreclosure. Cost of the blue hour: included in the $225. He charged me $0 extra for the 11 frames, the two lamps, or the kneeling.
the hallway, redone
The relist went live July 7, same price, $214,900, same 1,340 square feet, new pixels. Jolene pulled the old listing and reuploaded fresh, hero shot now the kitchen with mornin' sun on the counter, the hallway second, twilight exterior in the fourth slot. Nothing else about the house changed. Paint, price, grass, same. In the first 48 hours the saves jumped from 14 to 39, and showing requests arrived at a pace I had not seen since June.
eleven showings in nine days
Eleven showings in nine days, some booked in pairs, including one buyer who came back with her father and measured the basement with a tape measure. Two offers landed before the second weekend: July 15 at $205,000, and July 18 at $208,500 with a two-week leaseback request I could not accommodate, cuz Andover was already ours. The third came July 19 at $212,500, clean, no leaseback, buyer pre-underwritten thru Emprise Bank, which is a stronger letter than a pre-approval and closes in 30 days.
three offers, one clean
We took the $212,500 on July 19 at 6 in the evenin' and signed within the hour, from a porch in Andover. The appraisal on August 4 printed $214,000, above contract, and the buyer's 30-day clock held. We closed August 21 at the same title office where we had closed on Andover, different table, same bad coffee. Net of everything, the photographer bill was $225 against a double-carry stretch of about $5,450 that the first set of photos helped extend.
the invoice on the fridge
The $225 invoice is on my fridge now, next to a printout of the first listing sheet, the failure and the fix on the same appliance. The hallway photo runs first in my own camera roll, the one Martin took from his knees. Same house. Same price. New pixels. That is it.